From: unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:22:33 +0000
Subject: {UnitedHinduFront} Digest for
unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com - 6 Messages in 5 Topics
To: Digest Recipients <unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com>
=============================================================================
Today's Topic Summary
=============================================================================
Group: unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/topics
- Kashmir Shaivism: learn the spiritual treasure of Bharat [1 Update]
http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/41d11c870e33c2b5
- Fw: Fwd: Rahul to be PM by January!!!! - Dr.Swamy Tweets [1 Update]
http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/b125c016694eb3b
- Tamil Nadu Unfairly Targets Hindu Temples, from Stephen Knapp [1 Update]
http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/be6b8f5f58553506
- वेद और दस्यु [1 Update]
http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/b68b07fbec97f23a
- The two men Congress fears most and why - Anna and Modi [2 Updates]
http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/5b80051f5a38fa75
=============================================================================
Topic: Kashmir Shaivism: learn the spiritual treasure of Bharat
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/41d11c870e33c2b5
=============================================================================
---------- 1 of 1 ----------
From: Virendra Qazi <pomposh@gmail.com>
Date: Sep 28 10:33AM +0530
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/msg/9ca515d73b13b197
*Kashmir Shaivism is a universal spiritual philosophy based on the supreme
unity of the individual self with the God.*
**
*It accepts all the aspects of life in totality and teaches the path of
realization through Divine Grace.*
Please contemplate on 4 features of Kashmir Shaivism. Would love to
elaborate.
1) Universal Spiritual Philosophy - beyond the considerations of caste,
creed, gender, etc. Everybody is welcome.
2) Supreme Unity of the Individual Self with God - We and everybody have
emanated from Him and are just part of Him. Rev. Swami Laxman Joo would
explain Kashmir Shaivism as "Para Advaita", that encompasses and transcends
all traditions.
3) Diversity - As I said Kashmir Shaivism accepts all the aspects of life in
totality. No doubt, God has made everybody differently. We should respect
diversity as divine.
4) Divine Grace (Anugrah) - it is independent of human efforts and the only
way to transformation / realization. Grace can come on those whom He choses.
This is a very subtle aspect. What can humans do? Make effort to be worthy
of receiving His Grace.
=============================================================================
Topic: Fw: Fwd: Rahul to be PM by January!!!! - Dr.Swamy Tweets
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/b125c016694eb3b
=============================================================================
---------- 1 of 1 ----------
From: "Sandhya Jain " <sandhya206@bol.net.in>
Date: Sep 28 08:44PM +0530
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/msg/1b48dd2f2514c738
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: 28 September 2011 19:36
Subject: Rahul to be PM by January!!!! - Dr.Swamy Tweets
Swamy39 Subramanian Swamy
Sonia packing bags to leave for chemotherapy. Conveyed to PM that he
must resign by December and propose Rahul. Antony ditched.
9 hours ago Favorite Retweet Reply
=============================================================================
Topic: Tamil Nadu Unfairly Targets Hindu Temples, from Stephen Knapp
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/be6b8f5f58553506
=============================================================================
---------- 1 of 1 ----------
From: "Mohan Gupta" <mgupta@rogers.com>
Date: Sep 27 10:37PM -0400
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/msg/73c02458e72c5b5d
Tamil Nadu Unfairly Targets Hindu Temples, from Stephen Knapp
From: srinandan@aol.com
Namaste,
I've warned about this before, but this kind of bias against Hindu and
Vedic temples continues to go on. There needs to be serious
demonstrations in India itself to oppose this kind of arrangements
that work against the Hindu community for the benefit of the Christian
and Muslim communities.
Hari Om,
Stephen Knapp
Tamil Nadu Unfairly Targets Hindu Temples While Giving Other Religions
Full Freedom
Tamil Nadu is home to some of the richest Hindu temples
The Tamil Nadu government claims to be secular but has been treating
Hindu institutions and temples differently compared to institutions of
other religions. The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
Department administers 36,425 temples, 56 mutts, 47 temples belonging
to mutts, 1721 specific endowments and 189 trusts. The department
claims to be watching over all religious institutions to maintain
secularism but it has only been looking over the Hindu religious
institutions and this policy is not being applied to any other
religions like Christian or Islamic institutions.
The indifference and lack of stance against such an issue by Hindus
along with the pushy missionaries being let into the region are the
two main causes of such an injustice. This has allowed the Tamil Nadu
government to process the way it does, assuming such a level of
control.
Prominent mutts of the 1840's—when the British ruled—were asked to
take over certain temples and endowments. The heads of these mutts
made sure to get written documents from the British Government
assuring the mutts that the temples would not be taken into
repossession by the government.
The mutts ran the temples well and efficiently using funds provided
where they should have been used—to perform important rituals and for
renovations in the temple. Overall, the funds were used for the
primary purpose of the temple—supporting worship. However, contrary to
this, thousands of other religious institutions were simply handed
over to the trustees with the government providing little or no
supervision at all with what was being done with the funding and
whether it was being utilized for the purpose of which it was given
for.
The Madras Hindu Religious Endowment Act of 1925, was passed by the
local Legislature for the purpose of providing better governance and
administration of Hindu temples. This act was widely changed and
adapted several times to consolidate the government's power over the
Hindu institutions, both before and after Independence. After
independence, the act was widely expanded.
What Hindus must remember is that it is not the job of a government
body to rule over and administer what is going on with Hindu temples,
especially when the same body is not doing the same for churches and
mosques in the same region. There must be something wrong if policies
that were originated, to be applied to all religions, are only being
applied to one religion continuously. Hindus should group together and
petition against such government bodies, bringing outside agencies to
help and audit the HR and CE Department and its activities related to
this issue. Hindus should work together to gain back access to the
temples so that they are handed over to their respective trustees or
appropriate Hindu associations.
From: Mukund Apte - mdapte@gmail.com;
HR (Hindu Religious Endowment) and CE (Charitable Endowments) Act - A
FRAUD ON CONSTITUTION
That is the reason why our leaders consented for Democratic set up for
Administration of Bhaarat. Once elected, the people are NOT concerned
with what the Government (people) do. Neither Janataa can INTERFERE
with the Administration. And this is the characteristic of DEMOCRACY.
In Shaantiparv of Mahaabhaarat, Pitaamah Bheeshm does give advice for
Dhaarmic Ruling. The king has to ensure that the basic needs of every
citizen (Food, Shelter and clothing) are fulfilled to their
satisfaction and any likely obstacles in their pursuit of (natural)
Development from manhood to Godhead are removed from interfering. The
king is considered to be failing even if single citizen remains
without any of these things. King was considered to be servant of
people and behaved as such. This was possible because most of the
kings and/or their advisers were Developed Individuals. They knew
individuals need and they did try with their selfishness fully under
control. Most important thing in the administration was that none had
anyone else to compete with. Competition makes a person jealous and
puts in his efforts (even amoral ways as well) to overcome any of his
shortcomings. That is why Vedas had initiated Chaaturvarny System.
Every Varn had its own responsibilities without any competition or
conflict. This was not known to Westerners when they started
organising themselves. And they preferred Democracy over their despot
overlords that they suffered. This is most competitive way of
Administration. Everyone wants to put the other one (opponent) behind.
The Janataa can never be happy and contented. And we also have
accepted Democracy. What we are seeing nowadays is only its result.
Not only Bhaarateey, but Democracy in any country creates such
situations as at present in Bhaarat. In Kerala, it is seen that people
are going towards Alcohol and smoking like never before. In
Maharashtra the Government declares, that they cannot ban alcohol sale
since it is major contributor of State Revenue. Surely they may
encourage the citizens to drink it to enhance the State revenue, isn't
it? The States (and of course the Centre as well) have no concern for
welfare of citizens. Moreover Bhaarat has the history of Mahatma
Gandhi (under whose name-banner the State is running, isn't it?)
backing Prohibition.
Our Constitution can say anything, but the facts (even) about
Democracy are different. Definition of Democracy can be anything but
in actual fact (unless the Leaders are Developed Individuals) it can
never make people (i.e. Janataa) happy and contented. Because only
Developed Individual leaders can understand aspirations and hopes of
the country and its Janataa really and will strive to achieve the
same. Only Bhaaratiya culture and Philosophy has those techniques and
ways by which anyone can become developed individual and becomes 'free
from selfishness'. Then let that person be a commoner, the people
around him will become happy. If he becomes King or even dictator,
then also no problem is faced by the country or the community at all.
Main reason for the current unstable condition in ALL the countries in
the world is following Democracy as suggested or imposed by the West.
No people in any country are comfortable and happy. We, Bhaaratiya
people are surely not happy at all.
The reason for this is the system of State Administration that we are
following, 'Democracy'.
Do you really feel Democracy that we are practicing is good and
effective to make all Bhaaratiya people happy & comfortable with it?
Please note that this system is really 'foreign' to us and was imposed
by British and then continued by our Government even after 1947. Since
ancient times, this Democracy was never in vogue in Bhaarat and
Bhaarat was known to outsiders as 'Suvarnbhoomee'. Even foreign
travelers have written that there was no beggar anywhere therein.
People were happy and contented. There was no Democracy there then.
Since last 60 years Bhaarat is using Democracy and Janataa is electing
its representatives to rule over self. The people or voters rarely, if
at all, elected parties but the persons whom they feel were their true
leaders. In Democracy, such people have no place and to do anything
they have to join a political party. If that becomes ruling one, then
these 'leaders' have to obey the party diktats on everything and vote
for those resolutions agreed by the party. Once become ruling, that
party does not give any value or importance to the election manifesto
that they might have declared for getting votes. They carry out their
activities and resolutions as per their predetermined agenda. They do
not accept any interference of Janataa in its functioning, nor do they
give any value or importance to the opposition parties in the
Parliament. In spite of these 'obstacles' they carry out their
programmes. During all the period between elections, they are busy in
collecting money for themselves and their party and also trying to
keep their vote banks happy, so that they can get elected in next
election also. They have no time to worry for the Nation or the people
therein. Just imagine with more than 45 lakh crore rupees as GDP of
Bhaarat, there is over 60% of its population not having adequate food
to eat for survival. Of all people, farmers are committing suicides.
It is surely not expected from a responsible Government? But this is
Democracy. Counting heads for Administration of State was never
considered essential in Bhaarat till now.
The elected representatives (especially the Ministers heading some
Departments) do need heavy protection from the people (their voters?).
How can they function under such dangerous environment of Democracy?
How much money is spent on this aspect? May be due to that only our
Government cannot give food to their hungry people. Actually it is the
responsibility of Government to ensure that all their citizens get
their basic needs like food, shelter 7 clothing to their satisfaction,
isn't it?
Whenever a small committee is formed (under Constitutional tasks)
consisting members of Government as well as other parties in
Parliament, its quantitative construction is based on the strengths of
various groups/parties in the parliament. Surely it is understood that
Government group will have larger number in them. In case their
recommendations/decisions were to be dependent only on majority in the
committee/s why could the Constitution made it consisting of ALL
groups. Parties in the parliament? It is the intention of Constitution
that their decisions/recommendations must be by CONSENSUS, isn't it?
But the rulers do as Democracy permits them and the cases like Shri
Thomas (the recent CVC case in Bhaarat) crop up. Could it have
happened but for the Democracy?
A special arrangement in Democracy (especially in Bhaarat) if you
realise, is the state that the elected representatives including
Ministers have to move in Bhaarat also under heavy protection. Isn't
it a travesty of situation? They have been elected by majority of
voters but are in danger from others. Who are these 'others'? Under
such conditions can anything good is possible for all the citizens in
Bhaarat by the actions/projects of the 'elected democratic'
government?
Government is merrily following Western culture abandoning our own. Do
not think that the Democracy being followed by West is anything
superior or different. Are you aware that just 5 years before, the
Democratic Party of USA had established Environmental Pollution
Administration Commission to ensure that the Industry maintains the
Environment pollution-free? They made some rules for the industry to
follow for this purpose in the meantime. Just last year the
Republicans (who have majority in Senate now) warned the EPA
Commissioner not to make Industry expends more money, with
environmental pollution aspect. They claim that there is no proof that
the environmental pollution is due to industrial activities. Thus USA
'Democracy' leaders also are not concerned with Earth (leave aside
mere USA). Whatever one party (when it was in majority) had done, the
other just dismantles the same when their chance comes. Currently, the
people are crying hoarse that unless Debt limit of USA is enhanced
from the current! 4.3 Tr $, the Government will come to stand still
and no money payment could be effected by it. Dollar will surely fall
and USA will be heckled when it cannot do any payment. But the
Majority politicians in Congress are unmoved. Unless President agrees
not to increase taxes on rich persons and reduce help to needy
(Americans) no debt enhancement will be approved by the Republican
Congress. Is it the way the States should function? How can the common
people be benefited with such behaviour of their representatives?
Recent issue of 'The Economist' has clearly stated that current
economic conditions in USA are not improving because of pigheadedness
of its politicians. Please also note that the candidates for Congress
are democratically (voted by the Party voters) chosen by the political
parties in USA. The result is hardly any different than anywhere else
where they are nominated by the Party. Don't you see it? Sir? No
difference in resulting Administration of the Nation is apparent in
these democratically selected Party candidates, isn't it? A news about
which we are not normally aware is that in the richest country in the
World, USA has currently 44 million people needing Government help
with food stamps. Some i.e. 14% of them are having their income
exceeding poverty line one. Since food items have more inflation,
these people do need the help from the Government. They get food
coupons (called food stamps in USA) for exchanging them with food
items at pantries. The population of USA is around 300 million.
What is happening in UK, the basic Democracy cradle, as far as Asia is
concerned? Labour and Conservative plus Democratic parties are
fighting to put down the other, isn't it? What is happening to UK or
the people therein? Are they getting happier? No politician appears to
be concerned, isn't it? The recent exposure of the horrid case of
'News of The World' owned by Shri Rupert Murdoch in UK is serious
example of Democracy in functioning in UK, isn't it? What happened
there in just last week? Riots and looting was resorted to by people
who were poor and destitute. British economy is supposed to be the
best in the Europe.
Just see any country having Democracy. You will find there are minimum
two divisions among people and are continuously fighting for power
(for themselves), isn't it? How can Democracy really give any comfort
or happiness to people or any prestige to the country? In Democracy,
the Government always becomes arrogant and cannot consider all people
as their own. Only recently one of Bhaaratiya Ministers has declared
that they function for the good of (only) majority and not all people.
Is this the responsibility of the democratically elected Government?
The Rulers will try by hook or crook to get re-elected in next
election and nothing else. That is the problem.
Merely blaming and crying against the leaders and/or the criminals
damaging the community fabric in our country will in no way help to
repair the damage. This is likely to darken our own minds and may give
in to pessimism. There is no time for rise of pessimism in us at this
critical time. So we should stop doing this.
Actually, as Dr Ferguson, a historian in Harvard Institutes states in
his book "Civilization: The West and the Rest", the West has patented
six applications (of Statecraft) since last 600 years and has offered
them to the Rest. The Rest have started accepting them since last 100
years starting with Japan as the first. USA, as we see, currently is
in its downhill journey and none can expect it to come up in near
future. Japan has also (apparently due to Natural disasters enhanced
by the nuclear plant fall out) going the same way. Please note that
the author gives the applications an adjective 'killer'. One of them
is 'Competition'. Don't you think Democracy is only Political 'Avtaar'
of Competition?
In the world, especially the West knows no Statecraft experience
except under (Cruel) dictators or kings. Possibly, that is why they
consider Democracy as better and hence ideal one. In fact what the
State or Rulers must do is not known to them. In Shantiparv of
Mahaabhaarat, Pitaamah Bheeshm from his deathbed of arrows explains
the details to
=============================================================================
Topic: वेद और दस्यु
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/b68b07fbec97f23a
=============================================================================
---------- 1 of 1 ----------
From: Agniveer <agniveer@gmail.com>
Date: Sep 28 09:14AM +0530
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/msg/658db60b64ea41ed
*(Adapted from http://agniveer.com/5528/vedas-and-dasyu-hi/*
*
*
*This article is also available in English at
http://agniveer.com/839/vedas-dasyu-hinduism/)*
मैकाले की कुटिल शिक्षा नीति के कारण ही अनेक भारतीय विद्वान भी यह मानते हैं
कि वेद में कथित आर्यों और दस्युओं के संघर्ष का वर्णन है | आर्य लोग मध्य
एशिया से आए हैं | भारत के मूल निवासी दास या दस्यु थे, जिन्हें आर्यों ने आकर
लूटा, खदेडा, पराजित कर दास बनाया, कठोर व्यवहार कर उनसे नीचा काम करवाया और
सदा के लिए भारतवर्ष पर आधिपत्य स्थापित कर लिया |
वेदों के बारे में पाश्चात्य विद्वानों ने यह लाल बुझक्कड़ वाली कल्पना इस देश
की वैदिक विचारधारा, सभ्यता, संस्कृति को नष्ट कर पाश्चात्य पद्धतियों के
प्रचार – प्रसार तथा यहां साम्राज्य स्थापित करने के लिए ही गढ़ी थी | और इस
देश का सत्यानाश करने के षड्यंत्र में शामिल उनके पुछल्ले साम्यवादी भी यही राग
अलापते रहते हैं कि आर्यों ने अपनी महत्ता को जन्मगत भेदभाव के आधार पर
प्रस्थापित किया |
भारतवर्ष को विभाजित करनेवाले इन्हीं विचारों के कारण आज स्वयं को द्रविड़ तथा
दलित कहलानेवाले भाई – बहन जो अपने आप को अनार्य मानते हैं – उनके मन में वेदों
के प्रति तथा उन्हें मानने वालों के प्रति घृणा और द्वेष का ज़हर भर गया है,
परिणाम देश भुगत ही रहा है |
उनकी इस निराधार कल्पना का खंडन कई विद्वान कर चुके हैं | यहां तक कि डा.
अम्बेडकर भी उनके इन विचारों से सहमत नहीं थे | क्योंकि इस मिथ्या विवाद का
आधार वेदों को बताया जा रहा है तो अब हम वेदों से ही आर्य और दस्यु के वास्तविक
अर्थ जानेंगे | यही इस लेख का मूल उद्देश्य है |
*आरोप : वेदों में कई स्थानों पर आर्य और दस्यु का वर्णन आया है | कई मंत्र
दस्यु के विनाश तथा आर्यों के रक्षा की प्रार्थना करते हैं |* कुछ मंत्र तो यह
भी कहते हैं कि जो स्त्रियां भी दस्यु पाई जाएं तो उन्हें भी नहीं बख्शना चाहिए
| इसलिए इस निष्कर्ष पर पहुंचा जा सकता है कि वेद में दस्युओं पर आर्यों के
अत्यंत घातक आक्रमण का वर्णन है |
*समाधान : *ऋग्वेद में दस्यु से संबंधित ८५ मंत्र हैं | जिन में से कई दास के
संदर्भ में भी हैं, जो दस्यु का ही पर्यायवाची है | आइए उन में से कुछ के अर्थ
देखें -
ऋग्वेद १|३३|४
हे शूरवीर राजन् ! विविध शक्तियों से युक्त आप एकाकी विचरण करते हुए अपने
शक्तिशाली अस्त्र से धनिक दस्यु (अपराधी) और सनक*: *(अधर्म से दूसरों के पदार्थ
छीनने वाले ) का वध कीजिये | आपके अस्त्र से वे मृत्यु को प्राप्त हों | यह सनक
*:* शुभ कर्मों से रहित हैं |
यहां दस्यु के लिए 'अयज्व' विशेषण आया है अर्थात् जो शुभ कर्मों और
संकल्पों से रहित हो और ऐसा व्यक्ति पाप कर्म करने वाला अपराधी ही होता है |
अतः यहां राजा को प्रजा की रक्षा के लिए ऐसे लोगों का वध करने के लिए कहा गया
है | सायण ने इस में दस्यु का अर्थ चोर किया है | दस्यु का मूल ' दस ' धातु है
जिसका अर्थ होता है – ' उपक्क्षया ' – जो नाश करे | अतः दस्यु कोई अलग जाति या
नस्ल नहीं है, बल्कि दस्यु का अर्थ विनाशकारी और अपराधी प्रवृत्ति के लोगों से
है |
ऋग्वेद १|३३|५
जो दस्यु (दुष्ट जन ) शुभ कर्मों से रहित हैं परंतु शुभ करने वालों के साथ
द्वेष रखने वाले हैं, आपकी रक्षा के प्रताप से वे भाग जाते हैं | हे पराक्रमी
राजेन्द्र ! आपने सभी स्थानों से ' अव्रत ' (शुभ कर्म रहित ) जनों को निकाल
बाहर किया है | इस मंत्र में दस्यु के दो विशेषण आए हैं – ' अयज्व ' = शुभ
कर्म और संकल्पों से रहित , ' अव्रत ' = नियम न पलनेवाला तथा अनाचारी | साफ़
है, दस्यु शब्द अपराधियों के लिए ही आया है | और सभ्य समाज में ऐसे लोगों को
दिए जानेवाले दंड का ही विधान वेद करते हैं |
ऋग्वेद १|३३|७
हे वीर राजन् ! इन रोते हुए या हँसते हुए दस्युओं को इस लोक से बहुत दूर भगा
दीजिये और उन्हें नष्ट कर दीजिये तथा जो शुभ कर्मों से युक्त तथा ईश्वर का गुण
गाने वाले मनुष्य हैं उनकी रक्षा कीजिये |
ऋग्वेद १|५१|५
हे राजेन्द्र ! आप अपनी दक्षता से छल कपट से युक्त ' अयज्वा' ' अव्रती'
दस्युयों को कम्पायमान करें, जो प्रत्येक वस्तु का उपभोग केवल स्वयं के लिए ही
करते हैं, उन दुष्टों को दूर करें | हे मनुष्यों के रक्षक ! आप उपद्रव, अशांति
फैलानेवाले दस्युओं के नगर को नष्ट करें और सत्यवादी सरल प्रकृति जनों की रक्षा
करें |
इस मंत्र में दान- परोपकार से रहित, सब कुछ स्वयं पर ही व्यय करने वाले को
दस्यु कहा है |
कौषीतकी ब्राह्मण में ऐसे लोगों को असुर कहा गया है | जो दान न करे वह असुर है,
अतः असुर और दास दोनों का तात्पर्य दुष्ट अपराधी जनों से है |
ऋग्वेद १|५१|६
हे वीर राजन् ! आप प्रजाओं का शोषण करने वालों की हत्या और ऋषियों की रक्षा
करते हैं | और दुसरों की सहायता करने वालों के कल्याण के लिए आप महादुष्ट
जनों को भी कुचल देते हैं | सदा से ही आप दस्यु ( दुष्ट जनों ) के हनन के लिए
ही उत्पन्न होते हैं |
यहां दस्यु के लिए ' शुष्ण ' का प्रयोग है – जिसका अर्थ है शोषण – दु*:*ख देना
|
ऋग्वेद १|५१|७
हे परमेश्वर ! आप आर्य और दस्यु को अच्छे प्रकार जानते हैं | शुभ कर्म करने
वालों के लिए आप ' अव्रती' (शुभ कर्म के विरोधी ) दस्युओं को नष्ट करो | हे
भगवन् ! मैं सभी उत्तम कर्मों के प्रति पालन में आपकी प्रेरणा सदा चाहता हूं |
ऋग्वेद १|५१|९
हे राजेन्द्र ! आप नियमों का पालन करने वाले तथा शुभ कर्म करने वाले के कल्याण
हेतु व्रत रहित दस्यु का संहार करते हो | स्तुति करने वालों के साथ द्वेष रखने
वाले, अनाचारी, ईश्वर गुण गान रहित लोगों को वश में रखते हो |
ऋग्वेद १|११७|२१
हे शूरवीर सेनाधीशों ! आप उत्तम जनों की रक्षा तथा दस्यु का संहार करो |
इस मंत्र में रचनात्मक कार्यों में संलग्न मनुष्यों को आर्य कहा गया है |
ऋग्वेद १|१३०|८
हे परम ऐश्वर्यवान् राजा ! आप तीन प्रकार के – साधारण, स्पर्धा के लिए और सुख
की वृद्धि के लिए किए जाने वाले संग्रामों में यजमानम् आर्यम् ( उत्तम गुण,
कर्म स्वभाव के लोग ) का रक्षण करें | और अव्रतान् ( नियन के न् पलनेवाले,
दुष्ट आचरण वाले ), जिनका अंत*: *करण काला हो गया है, हिंसा में रत या हिंसा की
इच्छा करने वाले को नष्ट कर दें |
यहां ' कृष्ण त्वक् ' शब्द से कलि त्वचा वाले लोगों की कल्पना कर ली गई है |
जब की यहाँ ' कृष्ण त्वक् ' का अर्थ अंत*: *करण का दुष्ट भाव है | साथ ही यहां
' ततृषाणाम् ' और 'अर्शसानम्' भी आए हैं, जिनका अर्थ है – हिंसा करना चाहना
और हिंसा में रत | इस के विरुद्ध आर्य यहां श्रेष्ठ और परोपकारी मनुष्यों के
लिए आया है |
इस से स्पष्ट होता है कि आर्य और दस्यु शब्द गुण वाचक हैं, जाति वाचक नहीं हैं
|
ऋग्वेद ३|३४|९
यह मंत्र भी दस्यु का नाश और आर्य की रक्षा का अर्थ रखता है | यहां आर्य के लिए
वर्ण शब्द आया है, वर्ण अर्थात् स्वीकार किए जाने योग्य इसलिए आर्य वर्ण =
स्वीकार करने योग्य उत्तम व्यक्ति |
ऋग्वेद ४|२६|२
मैं आर्य को भूमि देता हूं, दानशील मनुष्य को वर्षा देता हूं और सब मनुष्यों के
लिए अन्य संपदा देता हूं |
यहां आर्य दान शील मनुष्यों के विशेषण रूप में आया है |
ऋग्वेद के अन्य मंत्र हैं -
ऋग्वेद ४|३०|१८
ऋग्वेद ५|३४|६
ऋग्वेद ६|१८|३
ऋग्वेद ६|२२|१०
ऋग्वेद ६|२२|१०
ऋग्वेद ६|२५|२
ऋग्वेद ६|३३|३
ऋग्वेद ६|६०|६
ऋग्वेद ७|५|७
ऋग्वेद ७|१८|७
ऋग्वेद ८|२४|२७
ऋग्वेद ८|१०३|१
ऋग्वेद १०|४३|४
ऋग्वेद १०|४०|३
ऋग्वेद १०|६९|६
इन मंत्रों में भी आर्य और दस्यु \ दास शब्दों के विशेषणों से पता चलता है कि
अपने गुण, कर्म और स्वभाव के कारण ही मनुष्य आर्य और दस्यु नाम से पुकारे जाते
हैं | अतः उत्तम स्वभाव वाले, शांतिप्रिय,
=============================================================================
Topic: The two men Congress fears most and why - Anna and Modi
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/t/5b80051f5a38fa75
=============================================================================
---------- 1 of 2 ----------
From: Madhukar Kumbhojkar <usindea@hotmail.com>
Date: Sep 28 11:58AM -0700
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/msg/68c13deaff7d9e91
The running Congress, Old congress, Gandhi/nehru Congress or any
member from the Congress wouldn't fear to anybody. They know that
this is "KALIYUG" and money counts everything. So, go ahead and by
hook or crook do whatever you like to gain wealth. This is the lesson
all congress people and Western countries are giving to the people.
From: unitedhindufront@gmail.com
To: unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com
Subject: {UnitedHinduFront} The two men Congress fears most and why -
Anna and Modi
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:01:40 -0400
The two men Congress fears most and why – Anna and Modi
During the last few months, Anna Hazare's crusade against corruption
has ripped the masks off several distinguished faces. We thought the
Niira Radia tapes had exposed the cozy nexus between power brokers and
senior journalists. But since Anna's campaign took off in April, a few
otherwise excellent media organisations have compounded the folly by
launching choreographed attacks on anti-corruption activists.
Proximity breeds complicity. If journalists get too close to their
subjects, they end up losing objectivity. Reporting on politics
requires keeping politicians at arms length. Tap sources for authentic
information. But the moment you become an instrument in the hands of a
political party you forfeit your status as an impartial watchdog of
the government.
The media must have a constructive but adversarial relationship with
the government – whether it's the Congress at the Centre or the BJP in
Karnataka. The fourth estate has a responsibility to the fifth estate
– the public whom we all serve and whose trust we hold – to be a tough
but fair observer of the other three estates: the executive,
legislature and judiciary.
Take two recent examples of choreographed journalism which violated
that public trust. It was deliberately misreported that Anna Hazare
had called voters "corrupt". He had in fact said on record – in the
context of the Tamil Nadu assembly elections – that politicians were
corrupting voters by bribing them with cash and TV sets. This factual
statement was distorted with clear mala fide intent through
synchronized editorials, op-ed articles, front-page reports and
slanted TV commentary.
The second example of choreographed journalism was the spate of
motivated reports on Prashant and Shanti Bhushan's doctored CD which
appeared on the front pages of two newspapers – and disappeared as
rapidly once the required damage to the reputation of the two key Team
Anna members had been accomplished.
Why is the Congress in particular – and other political parties in
general – so fearful of Anna that they wilfully distort what he says?
The answer: his anti-corruption campaign cuts the corrupt political
class to its bone. Those who cannot be defeated must be discredited
with the help of friendly newspapers and TV channels.
The Congress fears only one outcome: losing power. Its anger at Anna
Hazare stems from the realisation that he has turned the tide of
public opinion – perhaps decisively – against it. Losing power means
losing access to the huge cache of black money from kickbacks in
mining leases, land allocations and public-private-partnership
contracts that all governments in office – Congress, BJP, BSP – covet.
The only national-level threat to the Congress is the BJP. It is
therefore central Congress strategy to discredit it at every
opportunity. This is best achieved by creating a fear psychosis among
ordinary Muslims that a BJP-led government at the Centre will leave
them vulnerable to communal riots and discrimination. True secularism
educates and enriches Muslims as opposed to faux secularism that
impoverishes them and places them in neat, exploitable little
votebanks. All thoughtful leaders of the Muslim community must
urgently ponder: for how long will they remain complicit in exploiting
their own people?
Most political parties in power – whether the Congress at the Centre
or the BJP in the states – use black money to enrich themselves. The
number of crorepati-MPs has risen exponentially from 156 in the 2004
Lok Sabha to 315 in the 2009 Lok Sabha. Significantly, the number of
MPs with criminal chargesheets filed against them has also risen
during the same period – from 128 to 162.
Anna's demand to clean up this deeply tainted political system has
been termed "blackmail" – again by the same cabal of
government-friendly media. That turns the definition of blackmail on
its head. Who is blackmailing whom? Those who practice the politics of
smear or those who are victims of it?
The Congress watched Narendra Modi's self-purification exercise
earlier this week with growing trepidation. The party knows it is now
caught in a pincer movement. Anna has turned the secular middle-class
away from it. Modi could do the same with a much larger mass Hindu
majority fed up with the government's soft-on-terror, soft-on-Pakistan
line which keeps its Muslim votebank fearful and captive. Those who
create such communal paranoia claim to protect minorities but in fact
marginalize them as Muslims rather than treating them as Indians
first.
Anna and Modi have different agendas. They have little in common
ideologically. But together their supporters form an electoral
juggernaut which could send the Congress's national voteshare plunging
in the next Lok Sabha election from 28.55% to below 25%. The last time
that happened was in the 1998 Lok Sabha poll. The Congress won 25.82%
national voteshare then and 141 Lok Sabha seats. It sat in Opposition
for the next six years. It is the fear of history repeating itself
that drives the Congress strategy to discredit Anna and demonise Modi
with more than a little help from its distinguished friends in the
media.
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/headon/entry/the-two-men-congress-fears-most-and-why-anna-and-modi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "United Hindu Front" group.
Related websites : http://www.shehjar..com
To post mail at: Unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com
Unsubscriptions: Unitedhindufront-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Visit this group at: http://groups.google.com/group/Unitedhindufront?hl=en
*************************************************************************************
Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed are only of the persons
posting the mail and not of the Owner/Moderator of UHF group and will
not be responsible for the contents. the person/persons writing the
message will be solely responsible. Anyone who wishes to unsubscribe
from this group can do so by sending an email to
Unitedhindufront-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
***************************************************************************************
---------- 2 of 2 ----------
From: Trishool <lalhgehi@yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 28 12:05PM -0700
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/unitedhindufront/msg/e68791dae9604025
The two men Congress fears most and why – Anna and Modi
Anna Modi, Zindabad. !
Lal
________________________________
From: Madhukar Kumbhojkar <usindea@hotmail.com>
To: unitedhindufront@gmail.com; unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com; Lal
Gehi <lalhgehi@yahoo.com>; vishwas joshi <vmjoshi2001@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: {UnitedHinduFront} The two men Congress fears most and
why - Anna and Modi
The running Congress, Old congress, Gandhi/nehru Congress or any
member from the Congress wouldn't fear to anybody. They know that
this is "KALIYUG" and money counts everything. So, go ahead and by
hook or crook do whatever you like to gain wealth. This is the lesson
all congress people and Western countries are giving to the people.
________________________________
From: unitedhindufront@gmail.com
To: unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com
Subject: {UnitedHinduFront} The two men Congress fears most and why -
Anna and Modi
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:01:40 -0400
The two men Congress fears most and why – Anna and Modi
During the last few months, Anna Hazare's crusade against corruption
has ripped the masks off several distinguished faces. We thought the
Niira Radia tapes had exposed the cozy nexus between power brokers and
senior journalists. But since Anna's campaign took off in April, a few
otherwise excellent media organisations have compounded the folly by
launching choreographed attacks on anti-corruption activists.
Proximity breeds complicity. If journalists get too close to their
subjects, they end up losing objectivity. Reporting on politics
requires keeping politicians at arms length. Tap sources for authentic
information. But the moment you become an instrument in the hands of a
political party you forfeit your status as an impartial watchdog of
the government.
The media must have a constructive but adversarial relationship with
the government – whether it's the Congress at the Centre or the BJP in
Karnataka. The fourth estate has a responsibility to the fifth estate
– the public whom we all serve and whose trust we hold – to be a tough
but fair observer of the other three estates: the executive,
legislature and judiciary.
Take two recent examples of choreographed journalism which violated
that public trust. It was deliberately misreported that Anna Hazare
had called voters "corrupt". He had in fact said on record – in the
context of the Tamil Nadu assembly elections – that politicians were
corrupting voters by bribing them with cash and TV sets. This factual
statement was distorted with clear mala fide intent through
synchronized editorials, op-ed articles, front-page reports and
slanted TV commentary.
The second example of choreographed journalism was the spate of
motivated reports on Prashant and Shanti Bhushan's doctored CD which
appeared on the front pages of two newspapers – and disappeared as
rapidly once the required damage to the reputation of the two key Team
Anna members had been accomplished.
Why is the Congress in particular – and other political parties in
general – so fearful of Anna that they wilfully distort what he says?
The answer: his anti-corruption campaign cuts the corrupt political
class to its bone. Those who cannot be defeated must be discredited
with the help of friendly newspapers and TV channels.
The Congress fears only one outcome: losing power. Its anger at Anna
Hazare stems from the realisation that he has turned the tide of
public opinion – perhaps decisively – against it. Losing power means
losing access to the huge cache of black money from kickbacks in
mining leases, land allocations and public-private-partnership
contracts that all governments in office – Congress, BJP, BSP – covet.
The only national-level threat to the Congress is the BJP. It is
therefore central Congress strategy to discredit it at every
opportunity. This is best achieved by creating a fear psychosis among
ordinary Muslims that a BJP-led government at the Centre will leave
them vulnerable to communal riots and discrimination. True secularism
educates and enriches Muslims as opposed to faux secularism that
impoverishes them and places them in neat, exploitable little
votebanks. All thoughtful leaders of the Muslim community must
urgently ponder: for how long will they remain complicit in exploiting
their own people?
Most political parties in power – whether the Congress at the Centre
or the BJP in the states – use black money to enrich themselves. The
number of crorepati-MPs has risen exponentially from 156 in the 2004
Lok Sabha to 315 in the 2009 Lok Sabha. Significantly, the number of
MPs with criminal chargesheets filed against them has also risen
during the same period – from 128 to 162.
Anna's demand to clean up this deeply tainted political system has
been termed "blackmail" – again by the same cabal of
government-friendly media. That turns the definition of blackmail on
its head. Who is blackmailing whom? Those who practice the politics of
smear or those who are victims of it?
The Congress watched Narendra Modi's self-purification exercise
earlier this week with growing trepidation. The party knows it is now
caught in a pincer movement. Anna has turned the secular middle-class
away from it. Modi could do the same with a much larger mass Hindu
majority fed up with the government's soft-on-terror, soft-on-Pakistan
line which keeps its Muslim votebank fearful and captive. Those who
create such communal paranoia claim to protect minorities but in fact
marginalize them as Muslims rather than treating them as Indians
first.
Anna and Modi have different agendas. They have little in common
ideologically. But together their supporters form an electoral
juggernaut which could send the Congress's national voteshare plunging
in the next Lok Sabha election from 28.55% to below 25%. The last time
that happened was in the 1998 Lok Sabha poll. The Congress won 25.82%
national voteshare then and 141 Lok Sabha seats. It sat in Opposition
for the next six years. It is the fear of history repeating itself
that drives the Congress strategy to discredit Anna and demonise Modi
with more than a little help from its distinguished friends in the
media.
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/headon/entry/the-two-men-congress-fears-most-and-why-anna-and-modi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "United Hindu Front" group.
Related websites : http://www.shehjar..com
To post mail at: Unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com
Unsubscriptions: Unitedhindufront-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Visit this group at: http://groups.google.com/group/Unitedhindufront?hl=en
*************************************************************************************
Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed are only of the persons
posting the mail and not of the Owner/Moderator of UHF group and will
not be responsible for the contents. the person/persons writing the
message will be solely responsible. Anyone who wishes to unsubscribe
from this group can do so by sending an email to
Unitedhindufront-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
***************************************************************************************
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "United Hindu Front" group.
Related websites : http://www.shehjar..com
To post mail at: Unitedhindufront@googlegroups.com
Unsubscriptions: Unitedhindufront-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Visit this group at: http://groups.google.com/group/Unitedhindufront?hl=en
*************************************************************************************
Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed are only of the persons
posting the mail and not of the Owner/Moderator of UHF group and will
not be responsible for the contents. the person/persons writing the
message will be solely responsible. Anyone who wishes to unsubscribe
from this group can do so by sending an email to
Unitedhindufront-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
***************************************************************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment